These tables are the best to be viewed in web version, please read the BMM Mobile Friendly Version guide.
GW
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
Arsenal
|
Sou(a)
|
Liv(a)
|
LEI
|
Wba(a)
|
MCI
|
WHU
|
Arsenal
|
Posp.
|
-0.5
|
Posp.
|
-5.5
|
1
|
-3
|
Burnley
|
Hul(a)
|
Swa(a)
|
Liv(a)
|
Sun(a)
|
TOT
|
STK
|
Burnley
|
1.5
|
2
|
14
|
-1
|
3.5
|
-4.5
|
Bournemouth
|
Wba(a)
|
Mun(a)
|
WHU
|
SWA
|
Sou(a)
|
Liv(a)
|
Bournemouth
|
7
|
9
|
4.5
|
-2
|
3
|
12
|
Chelsea
|
SWA
|
Whu(a)
|
WAT
|
Stk(a)
|
CRY
|
MCI
|
Chelsea
|
-13
|
-13.5
|
Posp.
|
-9
|
-11
|
-2.5
|
Crystal Palace
|
MID
|
Wba(a)
|
TOT
|
WAT
|
Che(a)
|
Sou(a)
|
Crystal Palace
|
6
|
4
|
Posp.
|
3
|
11
|
0
|
Everton
|
SUN
|
Tot(a)
|
WBA
|
HUL
|
Liv(a)
|
Mun(a)
|
Everton
|
-10
|
6
|
-7.5
|
-15
|
5
|
2
|
Leicester
|
LIV
|
HUL
|
Ars(a)
|
Whu(a)
|
STK
|
SUN
|
Leicester
|
6.5
|
-6.5
|
Posp.
|
0
|
1.5
|
-1.5
|
Liverpool
|
Lei(a)
|
ARS
|
BUR
|
Mci(a)
|
EVE
|
BOU
|
Liverpool
|
-6.5
|
0.5
|
-14
|
-0.5
|
-5
|
-12
|
Man. City
|
MUN
|
Sun(a)
|
STK
|
LIV
|
Ars(a)
|
Che(a)
|
Man. City
|
Posp.
|
-14.5
|
Posp.
|
0.5
|
-1
|
2.5
|
Man. Utd
|
Mci(a)
|
BOU
|
Sou(a)
|
Mid(a)
|
WBA
|
EVE
|
Man. Utd
|
Posp.
|
-9
|
Posp.
|
-11.5
|
-5.5
|
-2
|
Middlesbrough
|
Cry(a)
|
Stk(a)
|
SUN
|
MUN
|
Swa(a)
|
Hul(a)
|
Middlesbrough
|
-6
|
-2
|
Posp.
|
11.5
|
-4.5
|
-5
|
Hull City
|
BUR
|
Lei(a)
|
SWA
|
Eve(a)
|
WHU
|
MID
|
Hull City
|
-1.5
|
6.5
|
1.5
|
15
|
8
|
5
|
Southampton
|
ARS
|
Wat(a)
|
MUN
|
Tot(a)
|
BOU
|
CRY
|
Southampton
|
Posp.
|
-4.5
|
Posp.
|
6
|
-3
|
0
|
Tottenham
|
STK
|
EVE
|
Cry(a)
|
SOU
|
Bur(a)
|
Swa(a)
|
Tottenham
|
-9
|
-6
|
Posp.
|
-6
|
-3.5
|
-12
|
Stoke
|
Tot(a)
|
MID
|
Mci(a)
|
CHE
|
Lei(a)
|
Bur(a)
|
Stoke
|
9
|
2
|
Posp.
|
9
|
-1.5
|
4.5
|
Sunderland
|
Eve(a)
|
MCI
|
Mid(a)
|
BUR
|
Wat(a)
|
Lei(a)
|
Sunderland
|
10
|
14.5
|
Posp.
|
1
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
Swansea
|
Che(a)
|
BUR
|
Hul(a)
|
Bou(a)
|
MID
|
TOT
|
Swansea
|
13
|
-2
|
-1.5
|
2
|
4.5
|
12
|
Watford
|
WHU
|
SOU
|
Che(a)
|
Cry(a)
|
SUN
|
WBA
|
Watford
|
5
|
4.5
|
Posp.
|
-3
|
-1.5
|
1
|
West Brom
|
BOU
|
CRY
|
Eve(a)
|
ARS
|
Mun(a)
|
Wat(a)
|
West Brom
|
-7
|
-4
|
7.5
|
5.5
|
5.5
|
-1
|
West Ham
|
Wat(a)
|
CHE
|
Bou(a)
|
LEI
|
Hul(a)
|
Ars(a)
|
West Ham
|
-5
|
13.5
|
-4.5
|
0
|
-8
|
3
|
Date:
|
25-Feb
|
4-Mar
|
11-Mar
|
18-Mar
|
1-Apr
|
4-Apr
|
This is the latest difficulty table generated by team performances data from gameweek 1 until gameweek 25. Hopefully you don't miss the list of targeted teams in this review.
- Chelsea ~ -49.0 FP (BGW28)
- Liverpool ~ -37.5 FP (No Blank)
- Spurs ~ -36.5 FP (BGW28)
- Man. United ~ -28.0 FP (BGW26&28)
- Everton ~ -19.5 FP (No Blank)
- Man. City ~ -12.5 FP (BGW26&28)
- Arsenal ~ -8.0 FP (BGW26&28)
Teams with the best fixtures GW 26-31 |
Chelsea assets come first and scoring the highest Fixtures Points even after comparing with no blank teams. They have 4 good games in next 6 gameweeks and their assest with the high potential for captaincy is considering a must keep even they have blank in GW28.
Only 2 from total 8 teams without the blank entering in the top 5 list, that is Liverpool and Everton. Meaning only this 2 teams are worth to invest heavily on their best players for next 6 gameweeks. Liverpool vs Burnley in GW28 is one of the potential game for captaincy.
Spurs is in the third place, with blank in GW28 but they have 2 good game before that and 3 good games after the blank.
There are 3 teams with 2 blank gameweeks in the top 7, if comparing the fixtures between Man.United, Arsenal and Man.City, Ibrahimovic is the best to keep because he have 3 good games for captaincy around the blank, vs Bournemouth, Middlesbrough, and West Brom.
Arsenal and Man.City scoring lower Fixtures Points than Man.United, so think twice before buying or double-up on their assets, and maybe just keep one of their key player if you want to keep them. They still have few good games but there are 5 teams that have better fixtures than Arsenal and Man.City in next 6 gameweeks. So if you want to change your key players from Arsenal and Man.City, pick the replacement from the teams in no.1 to no.5. Get Arsenal and Man.City assest back when their fixtures turned better after the blank gameweeks.
Teams with decent fixtures GW 26-31:
- Middlesbrough ~ -6.0 FP (BGW28)
- Southampton ~ -1.5 FP (BGW26&28)
- West Ham ~ -1.0 FP (No Blank)
- Leicester ~ 0.0 FP (BGW28)
- Watford ~ 6.0 FP (BGW28)
- West Brom ~ 6.5 FP (No Blank)
Teams with decent fixtures GW 26-31 |
- Burnley ~ 15.0 FP (No Blank)
- Stoke ~ 23.0 FP (BGW28)
- Crystal Palace ~ 24.0 FP (BGW28)
- Swansea ~ 28.0 FP (No Blank)
- Sunderland ~ 28.5 FP (BGW28)
- Bournemouth ~ 33.5 FP (No Blank)
- Hull ~ 34.5 FP (No Blank)
Teams with the worse fixtures GW 26-31 |
Try to minimize the number of defender from the worse team, but if you still want to hold them, make sure you have a good rotation.
The list of teams to be look and to be avoided are now ready, so next we just monitor the players, who is in and who is out. Good luck with your team in next game week!.
1. All data are based on latest 2016/17 season teams performances, the difficulties are calculated based on the home/away match difficulty.
2. If the font for opponent is upper case example "LIV", that's means it is a home match against Liverpool. If the font of opponent is lower case and followed by (a) example Liv(a), that's means it is an away match against Liverpool.
3. The difficulties are differentiated by the colors, Green for Easy and Red for Hard.
Easy
|
Medium
|
Hard
|
5. The difficulty level for Easy(-2.5 to -20), Hard(2.5 to 20), the bigger the number the match will be more easy or more difficult.
6. FP=Fixtures Points, the points that explained in note no.5.
7. Legend: 3gm = 3 games, 6gm = 6 games, hgm = home games.
See also:
FPL Potential Captain BGW26
EPL Team Chances for BGW26
Fixtures review for teams without blank in GW26 and GW28
No comments:
Post a Comment