Teams | Location | Stadium | Capacity | Head Coach |
JDT | Johor Bahru | Larkin | 30,000 | Mario Gómez |
Terengganu | K. Terengganu | Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin | 50,000 | Ahmad Yusoff |
Selangor | Shah Alam | Shah Alam | 80,372 | Zainal Abidin Hassan |
Felda United | Jengka | Tun Abdul Razak | 25,000 | Irfan Bakti Abu Salim |
Kedah | Alor Setar | Darul Aman | 32,387 | Tan Cheng Hoe |
Kelantan | Kota Bharu | Sultan Mohammad IV | 22,000 | K. Devan |
Pahang | Kuantan | Darul Makmur | 40,000 | Ahmad Shaharuddin Rosdi |
Sarawak | Kuching | Sarawak State | 40,000 | K. Rajagopal |
Penang | George Town | Bandaraya | 20,000 | Jacksen F. Tiago |
Perak | Ipoh | Perak | 60,000 | Syamsul Saad |
PDRM | Petaling Jaya | Shah Alam | 69,372 | Mohd Pauzi Pilus |
T-Team | K. Terengganu | Sultan Ismail Nasiruddin Shah | 15,000 | Rahmad Darmawan |
*T-Team = Terengganu FC II
The analysis results showing as per below.
Based on these results we can say JDT has the highest potential, followed by Terengganu, Selangor, Felda, Kedah, Kelantan, and Pahang. JDT will be the favored to win Super League title this season but that just a prediction because there are more factors that maybe will block their potential. For example the injuries, effect of others competition, changes of player or coach, and many more. Same to the low potential team, they can perform better because of these factors too.
The analysis results showing as per below.
Based on these results we can say JDT has the highest potential, followed by Terengganu, Selangor, Felda, Kedah, Kelantan, and Pahang. JDT will be the favored to win Super League title this season but that just a prediction because there are more factors that maybe will block their potential. For example the injuries, effect of others competition, changes of player or coach, and many more. Same to the low potential team, they can perform better because of these factors too.
Malaysia Super League Teams Potential Analysis by BMM | ||||||||||||
Team potential | 2015 Performance | Coach potential | Player compatibility | |||||||||
Points | Teams | Management | Support | Financial | Supporters | League | M. Cup | FA Cup | Achivement | Compatibility | First team | Foreign players |
10 | JDT | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
9 | Terengganu | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
9 | Selangor | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
7 | Felda United | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
7 | Kedah | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
6 | Kelantan | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
5 | Pahang | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
5 | Sarawak | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
4 | Penang | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
2 | Perak | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
2 | PDRM | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
1 | T-Team | 1 | ||||||||||
Description: | Team management & the management support | The support staff, physio, coaches, background staff | Financial strength & stability, sponsor, gate income | Home ground supporters, the number of supporters | Last season standings 1-6 | Malaysia Cup quarter finals team | FA Cup quarter finals team | coach standings 2015 competitions, 1-6 in the Super League , 1-2 in Premier League, semifinal Malaysia Cup, semifinal FA Cup. | compatibility with team (at least 1 season been the head coach for that team) | majority player of the first team (at least 1 season been in the same team) | at least 1 season been in the same team( 1 point for 2 Foreign players & 2 point for 4 Foreign players) |
This analysis will be used as a guide for us to improve our football teams. It maybe not very complete right now but it is good because we start to analysis the teams for the future improvement.
See also:
Fantasi Liga Malaysia 2016
Stats and analysis
Malaysia League Difficulty
Basic Football Team at the school level
Malaysian Football, will it bounce back after hit the ground?
See also:
Fantasi Liga Malaysia 2016
Stats and analysis
Malaysia League Difficulty
Basic Football Team at the school level
Malaysian Football, will it bounce back after hit the ground?
No comments:
Post a Comment